|   The highly suspicious death last 
				weekend of an Investigating Judge (Juge d’instruction) who was 
				probing alleged corruption in the presidential family has 
				shocked Haiti and started a cycle of charges and counter-charges 
				which will surely widen Haiti’s ever-growing political divide.
             Judge Jean 
				Serge Joseph was investigating a corruption case implicating 
				President Michel Martelly’s wife and son, Sophia and Olivier 
				Martelly. Both stand accused of siphoning off hundreds of 
				thousands of dollars from bogus social and sports programs, 
				which have made token gestures at reducing Haiti’s surging 
				poverty while being hyped by expensive propaganda campaigns and 
				counter-productive publicity stunts, critics charge.             The judge, 58, 
				died in a Port-au-Prince hospital on Jul. 13 from what the 
				hospital described in an unprecedented next-day press conference 
				as a “cerebrovascular accident” or ACV, in short, a kind of 
				brain embolism.             Sources close 
				to Judge Jean Serge Joseph say that in the days leading up to 
				his death, he was under intense pressure to drop the case, 
				having received many threats. According to several accounts, 
				pressure particularly intensified after the judge called for the 
				prosecution of the presidential family in Port-au-Prince’s 
				criminal court due to the findings of his investigation into 
				their alleged corruption.             According to 
				sources in Martelly’s entourage, the President was not at all 
				happy about Judge Jean Serge Joseph’s decision, which reportedly 
				even caused him to lose sleep. This case was a sort of Achilles 
				heel of the government, which portrays itself as promoting the 
				rule of law with lots of propaganda. 
				             Judge Jean 
				Serge Joseph did not merely refer the case to criminal court. On 
				Jul. 2, 2013, he issued a surprisingly bold order summoning as 
				witnesses Prime Minister Laurent Lamothe and other senior state 
				officials following a complaint filed by two young lawyers, 
				André Michel and Newton Saint-Juste, who accused Sophia and 
				Olivier Martelly of embezzlement and fraud. According to several 
				sources close to the judge, it is following this order that the 
				judge’s torments really began. "The threats became more 
				pronounced and were more specific," one source stressed. Some of 
				the president's advisers say that the issue had become too 
				embarrassing for the presidential family.             Some judges and 
				others involved in the justice system who requested anonymity 
				say that judges are constantly working under pressure whenever 
				they are dealing with a case involving people close to executive 
				power. These judicial officers believe that the executive branch 
				holds the judiciary hostage and hinders its operation. According 
				to them, the courts will not operate freely as long as the 
				executive continues to interfere in judicial affairs.              More 
				specifically President Martelly and Prime Minister Lamothe, in 
				the presence of Justice Minister Jean Renel Sanon and Dean of 
				Port-au-Prince’s Civil Court Raymond Jean Michel, browbeat and 
				intimidated the judge during two meetings at the law offices of 
				Martelly advisor Gary Lissade last week on Jul. 10 and 11, said 
				a prominent lawyer and former deputy who was a close friend of 
				the late judge. Speaking on Jul. 14 on TV Plural (Télé Plurielle) 
				in Port-au-Prince, Samuel Madistin claims to have spoken with 
				the judge before his death, the day after the meetings, and said 
				that Jean Serge Joseph was not allowed to be driven by his 
				personal driver or to be accompanied by his bodyguards. 
				According to Madistin, Martelly and Lamothe “demanded” that the 
				judge drop the case.              Other sources 
				close to the judge say these two meetings involved harassment 
				and “mental torture” in which he was clearly asked to scuttle 
				the case, which is currently under appeal. Twenty-four hours 
				after these stressful meetings, on Fri., Jul. 12, the judge 
				supposedly had a stroke that left him in a deep coma, although, 
				according to his family, he did not suffer from any serious 
				illnesses. Admitted to the Bernard Mevs Hospital in “critical 
				condition” (according to a hospital spokesman) on Saturday at 
				about 3 a.m., he died later that evening at around 8 p.m., 
				hospital sources said.             The Martelly 
				regime, implicated in many scandals, each more embarrassing than 
				the next, now has a corpse on its hands, and not just any 
				corpse, but that of a judge who was trying to shed light on a 
				matter which is fueling debate in all spheres of society. Across 
				Haiti and Haitian diaspora, the regime is considered one of the 
				most corrupt that the country has ever known. The judge’s 
				investigation could have allowed the presidential family, if it 
				is not involved in corruption, to prove their innocence and 
				clear their name. However, the regime’s methods have certainly 
				not dispelled suspicions about First Lady Sophia Martelly and 
				her son Oliver Martelly. On the contrary, public mistrust of the 
				regime has deepened.             Sanon, Jean 
				Michel, and Lissade have denied that they took part in the 
				meeting alleged by Mr. Madistin. In fact, they deny that any 
				such meeting ever took place. Mr. Lissade, a former justice 
				minister, said in a press release, that Mr. Madistin’s 
				"allegations were not the expression of any truth but were 
				rather of a lying nature.” Minister Sanon said Mr. Madistin’s 
				statements were “the product of his imagination.”             “I didn’t 
				participate in any meeting with the president, the prime 
				minister, and Serge Joseph,” Sanon said. “I don’t know what’s 
				being talked about.”             The president’s 
				spokesman, Lucien Jura, has also denied the meetings took place.             In response, 
				Mr. Madistin insisted that the threats made by Martelly and 
				Lamothe in the presence of Sanon and Jean Michel took place in 
				Lissade’s offices. Madistin vowed that he would sue for Judge 
				Jean Serge Joseph’s wrongful death.             Who and what 
				should we believe? Is it all a fabrication? Has Samuel Madistin 
				concocted this scenario alone? Why would he make such charges? 
				There are many gray areas in this case which need to be cleared 
				up.             Lawyers Newton 
				Saint-Juste and André Michel have called the judge’s death “a 
				political assassination.” According to them, the deceased judge 
				was constantly under pressure from President Martelly to abandon 
				the investigation and prosecution of his wife and son. The two 
				young lawyers express their determination to pursue this matter 
				to the end so that all light be shed on the alleged involvement 
				of the presidential family.             Meanwhile, the 
				Rev. Edouard Paultre, the head of the Haitian Council of Non 
				State Actors (CONHANE), declared that Judge Joseph Serge’s death 
				merits serious investigation to elucidate its cause.             Pierre 
				Esperance, Executive Director of the National Network for the 
				Defense of Human Rights (RNDDH), says the judge was under 
				pressure and death threats from the Martelly regime. Mr. 
				Esperance described the Martelly regime as a "wrongdoer power" 
				which does not respect human rights.              Alterpresse 
				reported on Jul. 16 that RNDDH and the Platform of Haitian 
				Organizations to Defend Human Rights (POHDH) sent a letter to 
				the Superior Council of Judicial Power (CSPJ) saying that there 
				is another “trusted person” who is ready to come forward to 
				confirm Madistin’s account. In their letter, the RNDDH and POHDH 
				said that Judge Serge Joseph “made important declarations to 
				friends as well as to other judges affirming that he was the 
				object of huge pressures from to executive to go back on his 
				decision” to summon high government officials as witnesses in 
				the case.             For Anthony 
				Barbier, a sociologist and former Planning and External 
				Cooperation Minister, what happened to the judge is one more 
				element that illustrates the need for the population to mobilize 
				to throw out a regime that does not respect its commitments and 
				human rights. "You can not build a democratic state of law while 
				at the same time human rights are being trampled," he said.             Outspoken Sen. 
				Moïse Jean-Charles also held a press conference to denounce 
				Judge Serge Joseph’s death as the responsibility of the Martelly 
				regime.             There are other 
				elements which should not be overlooked. First, Judge Serge 
				Joseph was admitted to the Bernard Mevs Hospital a 3 a.m., but 
				he was not seen by a doctor for four hours, until 7 a.m., 
				according to the two doctors (at least one of them North 
				American) who spoke to the press about the matter (Télé-Plurielle, 
				Jul. 14, 2013).              Secondly, this 
				is the first time in Haiti, a hospital had seen fit to hold a 
				press conference following the death of a patient where the 
				institution and the doctors at the bedside of the deceased 
				patient were not implicated in malpractice. Is this not strange?
				             Finally, one of 
				the doctors who met the press blatantly sported a pink bracelet, 
				which is worn by avid supporters of the Martelly regime. 
				Bizarre! In addition to an autopsy on the deceased, this 
				hospital should also be investigated. 
				
				            After the sudden death of Judge Serge Joseph, what 
				will be the result of the alleged corruption case involving the 
				first lady and the president's son? Will there be an honest 
				judge who will take up the investigation of this matter? Can a 
				judge look into this matter in peace, without being intimidated 
				or threatened by the National Palace? The list of questions goes 
				on and on. Nothing is certain in this case. The coming months 
				will reveal more about the true nature of this regime which uses 
				the concept of “rule of law” as a political slogan to fool the 
				weak-minded. |